Love, attention, therefore the inhibition out-of opinion away from close selection

Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, M. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J gorgeousbrides.net officielt websted. C. (2008). Development and Peoples Conclusion, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The place of attachment into the individual mating. Report about Standard Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A good. (2002). Internet sites paradox revisited. Log out of Societal Activities, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A personal tech that decreases public involvement and psychological better-are? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, R.Yards., & Industries, J. M. (2001). Amount, timing, and time of marriage ceremonies and you will divorces. Latest People Reports, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional research away from closeness, interests, and you will commitment: Testing the newest assumptions of one’s triangular idea of like. Emotional Records, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step three.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Impact ideal regarding the undertaking bad: Personal comparisons in this close matchmaking. Diary off Character and you may Societal Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A good., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh implicit cognition off close rivalry. Log out of Character and you will Social Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.

An effective. (2001)mitment and you can dating fix elements

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention in order to attractive options: The newest progressed psychology from matchmaking restoration. Advancement and Individual Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential data out of conflict and you can accord inside distressed and you may nondistressed marital lovers. Record regarding Contacting and Medical Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. A good., Eco-friendly, A. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationship development online: What’s the larger attraction? Journal out-of Societal Things, 58(1), 9–29.

The many benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization while the structure out of pleasure from inside the personal relationships

Neff, L. A beneficial., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-research motives inside the intimate relationships: A type of globally improvement and certain confirmation. Into the P. Noller & J. A good. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding ents throughout the study of pair communication (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge School Push.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the customer-therapist bond from the lens from accessory theory. Psychotherapy: Theory, Browse, Practice, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The fresh new personal overseeing program: Increased awareness to help you social cues due to the fact a transformative a reaction to societal exception to this rule. Within the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The brand new public outcast: Ostracism, societal exclusion, rejection, and you can intimidation (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Psychology Push.

Enter, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). International and you may particular relational habits about exposure to social affairs. Journal out-of Personality and you will Public Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A beneficial., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you may suggestions looking to for the romantic dating. Personality and you may Personal Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you will particular connection representations inside adulthood: Is there a romance?. Journal Off Public And private Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. When you look at the J. Harvey & A good. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate romantic matchmaking: Restoration and you can improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An effective. D. (2000). Projection physically impact one of partners as a function of brand new similarity within mutual knowledge. Identity And you will Public Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Negative effects of salience out-of extrinsic benefits towards taste and you may loving. Journal out of Character and you will Public Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.